The liberal professor’s honest admission came just moments before he suggested repealing the Second Amendment anyway.

According to Campus Reform, Eastern Connecticut State University’s Professor Englehart took to social media in the aftermath of the tragedy in Las Vegas to call for a repeal of the Second Amendment, which guarantees U.S.  citizens the right to bear arms. Englehart’s post was baffling, as before he even got to his suggestion to repeal the “cursed amendment”, he acknowledged that doing so would would not actually stop gun violence, merely “slow it down”, and only then after “a generation or two”.

Every time a gun is involved in a tragedy, the first thing the Left does is divert attention away from supporting victims or pursuing justice in favor of blaming firearms and calling for restrictions on a constitutionally-protected right. Englehart’s willingness to admit that more regulation isn’t actually a solution is rare, and presumably unintended, but at least it’s honest.

In another pique of honesty, Englehart announced “there’s a creep out there with a perverted belief system thinking, ‘Fifty-eight? Hell, I can top that.’” There are, in fact, thousands of such creeps. Unfortunately the Left is aggressively trying to import more. In the meantime, recent terrorist attacks have proven that guns are wholly unnecessary to commit mass murder. The tragic death toll of 59 in Las Vegas is dwarfed by the 84 dead in the Nice, France attack, which was carried out with a cargo truck, not a gun.

We can all hope that someday, society evolves beyond the kind of sociopathy that spurs this sort of attack, the hateful idiots that show up afterwards, and the ignorant fearmongers exploiting the victims to promote their agenda.

In the meantime, the Left will no doubt continue its campaign of willful ignorance about the real source of danger, and continue to exploit the Las Vegas victims in order to strawman the conservative stance that a good guy with a gun can save lives in an active shooter situation.

Feature Image via Pixabay and Creative Commons License

  • Steve O

    If we can save some lives by violating the 2nd amendment, just think how many more lives we can save by doing away with the need for search warrants!

    • Paul

      That’s dwarfed by the number that can be saved by banning abortion.

    • GTKRWN

      If we shipped the niggers back to Africa we’d eliminate something like 80% of all gun crime overnight! That’s a lot! I can’t see how a single liberal could ever say anything against this plan; the ol’ constitution is meaningless to them, so they can’t fall back on any of those silly amendments saying that blacks are actually people. (They aren’t.) I mean if it saves one life and all… and it would save thousands every year! Plus it only hurts a minority of the population! It’s surely much easier to round up just shy of 40 million blacks than it is to try to round up 150+ million gun owners!

      We can save even more money and only sail the boats half-way.

  • Jerald

    Pesky checks and balances always get in the way of controlling the populace.

  • laurie66bay

    Liberals secretly desire a King, because only a King can rule without regard to law.

    they just have the arrogance to think that if the king starts off a liberals, he will be a good king.

    There’s an old saying, Having an Emperor works great, as long as the Emperor is Marcus Aurelius.
    But eventually the Emperor is Nero or Caligula.

    • Steve O

      Perhaps it’s something like that.

      A common thread among liberals is the superiority complex. If the elite ran the world instead of by popular vote, things would be better. They themselves are elite, so they’d either be part of the ruling class or they’d be in complete agreement with whatever the ruling class decided to do.

    • ostensibly the king is the law.

  • Agent 99

    If the “liberal” gun-control mob were to get its way, only two groups end up having firearms:

    1) law enforcement agencies they already despise and do not trust
    2) criminals who think laws are for chumps

    Would someone explain the logic here?

    • Steve O

      Most of these advocates live in areas where they do not encounter any violent criminals, and the police are more likely to help you with directions than to arrest you.

    • At best gun-control will reduce gun accidents and gun suicides. It probably won’t reduce crimes committed with firearms.

    • gscott

      and the ‘criminals’ segment will then include millions of currenly law abiding folks.

    • GTKRWN

      Most of the libtards have even dropped the idea of law enforcement having guns, because that means one of their pet chimps might be put in danger. Though I’ve never understood why a liberal gets so angry about it; felon or dead they all still voted for Hillary.

  • Steve O

    The same crowd that thinks the government is fascist wants to disarm the citizenry?

    • GTKRWN

      Golems don’t think; they simply obey. A liberal is a puppet of the jew, made to serve the jew, and they can only repeat the lies their jewish media or jewish comedians order them to repeat. They lack any ability for independent thought. It’s what makes them so incredibly immune to the paradox of their own endless hypocrisy and their stunning capability for doublethink.

      Just look at one of them next time you encounter one in the wild, screaming slogans a jew wrote for them to repeat. They’re all only passingly human, with hollow dead eyes. There is no soul behind them. They are constructs, automatons. Servants.

  • … “There are, in fact, thousands of such creeps. Unfortunately the Left is aggressively trying to import more…

    Good line — but a bit of a stretch.

  • Anthony LaVere Rodrigues

    I find it more sinister than a deranged Professor. I look at it as a threat to out liberties: this is a professor who is capable of changing hearts and minds, and is out there spewing this crap to the young and impressionable. It’s not passive, but rather, is a subtle assault on the Core Values we as Americans hold dear. Remember what Benjamin Franklin said, “Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn” If we allow these vile anti-American professors to remain in power then the only remembrance the impressionable are going to have is those that taught them.

  • Taking back 300 million guns would be like returning 11 million Mexicans — It ain’t gonna happen.

  • Cobrajet

    But what about some gun control, that’s what people want, not repeal.

    • GTKRWN

      Almost ironically, if the jew hadn’t been so aggressively pushing for complete civilian disarmament for the last 70 years we’d actually have far more gun control today. Not even the smallest concession will be made with lying liberals, seditious, enemies of the US, and the globalist jews that own them, because they’ve proven over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again that they are liars that cannot be trusted. Give them anything and they demand more!

  • GTKRWN

    Liberals only consider it a “tragedy” when some white people die. Tens of thousands of dead niglets shooting themselves in their Planet of the Apes cities? That’s just population control. Liberals have never once attempted to take their guns, and attack the police that actually try…

    Coincidentally… of course.

  • ytuque

    Liberals are screaming that Trump and crew are sexist, racist, homophobic, islamophobic, transphobic, and even a fascist literally Hitler. Yet, these geniuses want Trump and crew to disarm the American public?

    If Liberals truly believed what they’re shouting from the rooftops, they would be advocating Liberals arm themselves.

    If Liberals truly believed in climate change threatening human existence, they would be demanding an end to mass immigration and zero population growth.

    The obvious conclusion is that Liberals do not mean what they say.