Parents remove six-year old from school where children are being taught to undermine a sense of identity that hasn’t even been built yet.

BBC News reports:

Nigel and Sally Rowe said their son was confused as to why the child at the Church of England School on the Isle of Wight dressed as both a boy and a girl.

The Diocese of Portsmouth, under which the school falls, said it was required to “respect diversity of all kinds”.

The couple believe the school should have consulted all parents.

Mrs Rowe told the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme that when they spoke with the school, which is not being identified, they were told “if a child wants to do that then we just have to accept it”.

The couple said under the school’s bullying policy their son faced being disciplined for misidentifying the gender of the six-year-old pupil.

Two years ago they removed their eldest son from the same school in a separate row about a different child with gender identity issues.

The Rowes say the suggestion that gender is fluid conflicts with their Christian beliefs and they are seeking a legal challenge against the school’s actions.

The Christian Legal Centre, which is supporting Mr and Mrs Rowe, said the couple were being accused of “transphobic behaviour” because of their “refusal to acknowledge a transgender person’s true gender”.

Mr Rowe said: “I am shocked by the suggestion, especially from a church school, that just because we question the notion that a six-year-old boy can really become a girl, we are transphobic.”

Frankly, there is a lot of debate surrounding gender these days. If you ask some people it’s the same as biological sex, end of story. If you ask others, it has to do with how well you fit into “socially constructed roles”. In other words, if you aren’t a walking stereotype your gender card gets revoked. Meanwhile, if you ask medical doctors generally gender has to do with whether a person feels their body is physically what it should be relative to biological sex.

Most right-leaning people know about clashes between the first and second categories, but may not know about how the latter two butt heads. Essentially, a measurable biological condition called gender dysphoria has been shown to exist. According to Dr. Ananya Mandal, this involves hormone imbalances in the womb that cause some people to feel on a visceral, instinctive level like they are trapped in the wrong body. Described as something of a horror-scenario for those individuals, at this point the way available to alleviate associated stress is to make the parts match as much as possible. Maybe one day there will be opportunities for people to address the imbalance rather than change the body if they choose, but for the time being options are limited. The reason there is an extensive series of tests and an age minimum of 18 in the U.S. for gender dysphoria diagnosis is that misdiagnosis can happen and (should it occur) is physically and psychologically disastrous. Pronouns are less important details for gender dysphoria and generally those dealing with the mess would prefer not to be identified as trans-anything, just ordinary men and women.

That’s the current medical perspective, readers are naturally free to think whatever they will of it. Postmodern ideologues, however, are prone to referring to anyone with the medical condition or advocating for the medical condition as “scum”, as they consider gender something to do with if you want to wear dresses or have short hair. Being required to have symptoms and a diagnosis to actually you know, have the medical condition, hurts their fee-fees and excludes them. And as always, the SJW solution to anyone who makes them feel bad is attack and destroy, preferably while using names like bigot, transphobe, or “truscum”.

Why does this information matter to a story about a child being removed from school? Because readers should be very clear, the regressives in charge of education pushing “transgenderism” are not talking about the medical condition. No responsible medical professional would ever diagnose a child with that condition or prescribe treatment, let alone quibble over dress codes.

An additional point presented by the BBC:

Mr. and Mrs. Rowe say the school’s handling of the situation did not show proper regard for the possible long-term emotional and psychological effects for the two young children seeking to change gender, or for the confusion and concern caused to other people by the suggestion that boys are not always boys, and girls are not always girls.

Regressives are trying to enforce and elevate crossdressing at the cost of confusing small children, preventing them from developing any sense of self or others, and inciting bullying on all sides. None of what is occurring between the Rowes and the Church of England School remotely has to do with science or medicine. The Rowes are being made to feel religiously uncomfortable and are having their children targeted by the administration of a Christian school over inconsistent dress policies and the ideological agenda of staff members. Little boys who don’t wear dresses will not be caused undue distress from wearing pants instead, especially in an age when boys and girls both commonly wear pants.

Small children who are just beginning to learn how the world operates on a normal basis are not psychologically, developmentally equipped to handle the subject of transgenderism. It can only cause undue insecurity and distress. Encouraging six year olds to think about it overmuch is outright irresponsible.

Featured Image Via Jasper Gregory

Source:

BBC

Healthnet.com

News-Medical.net

  • Steve O

    Tell the school that your child identifies as someone who only recognizes two biological genders. They’re a “bi-gender-recognizer” and the school needs to recognize and respect him, and shed themselves of such openly blatant and hostile anti-bi-gender-recognizer biases that your son finds oppressing!

    • MW

      Haha, I love this idea !! ????

    • Sannidor

      In theory, yes. it sounds funny. In dildo wars you don’t really want to use enemy weapons against them. Please keep battles on the level of reason and law. Yes, this is dildo war. They use lust and biotechnology as weapons. When science makes transgenders unrecognizable from “cis”, those who oppose will have to use ideology, religion or chromosomes argument. Other side will be represented by: “if it looks like a pussy and feels like a pussy, it’s a lady”. We will lose to biolab grown body parts, attached to sex-fluid creatures. Then, you will only identify as a bigot, if you oppose.

      • GTKRWN

        In real wars if the enemy’s weapons are more effective than your own you pick them up off the bodies of their dead and keep fighting. Only kike sympathisers keep crying “oi vey goyim, stop using what is already proven to work so well against us!”

        You’re dealing with the mentally ill. No amount of fact is going to change the mind of a liberal. Their entire belief system can only be mocked. Taking their own lunacy, amplifying it, and using it as a club to beat them with it IS effective… which is why the kike-allies keep whining when they see it used to such great effect.

        Bullets are far more effective at purging this cancer. I think being mocked is preferable to death camps. Though really, I’m all for the death camps. We’re giving the libs every chance to avoid them.

  • Steve O

    “…at this point the way available to alleviate associated stress is to make the parts match as much as possible.”
    — You know what an additional strategy is? Counseling a boy who feels like they’re a girl to feel more like a boy. Has anyone cared to measure the success of each of those alternatives based on the eventual lifetime happiness of the child?

    • James

      Google “trans conversion therapy”. Success rates are good, but only for kids that were going to grow out of it anyway.

  • misha1d1

    xx and yy. Sex is not fluid, it is a biological fact. The parents of the boy, who is in fact a boy, and the school are guilty of child abuse. Absolutely outrageous that this happens anywhere.

    • Paul

      XX and XY

      • misha1d1

        Thanks for the catch. Quick typing between meetings…

  • Jean Collier

    I wish Milo News would identify the staff writers. This was written so well, I’d like to commend the person

    • Timothy Kevin Ready

      They’d never work again in the news media if their names were identified. Liberals would Doxx them and harass them, and probably try to kill them.

  • Timothy Kevin Ready

    And still, 100 million Liberals go to bed at night wondering how Trump became president…

  • Rusty Esq

    I really liked the article, mostly.

    Children are amazing at being able to reason, sometimes better than adults.

    When I’ve recently reasoned with my children, they are starting to say “but I feel” as a reason. I have been pushing back and saying “be mindful of the feelings, but what’s the reason?”

    “It can only cause undue insecurity and distress. Encouraging six year olds to think about it overmuch is outright irresponsible.”

    The article was a little too dismissive of children’s intellect. It’s the whole “feelings before facts” that clouds children’s ability to rationalise, not some “delicate predisposition of children”. My children knew one of my closest friends was gay very early on. Is that outright irresponsible? If so, condemn me.

    I have another amazing friend. Her husband is bland++. She said her son was not very bright. I took him to one side, told him to “stop acting like a twit” (in front of his mother, as he was being a twit) and proceeded to have a very indepth and adult like conversation with her son. She nearly died of shock at his reasoning and maturity because she’d not thought him capable of it. Their relationship has blossomed and he now treats her with respect too!

    It’s the fucking Ars Technicas, the Verges, the New York Times, the BBCs … they constantly tell you how fragile people are. How children will crumble at the slightest sign of a hurdle (“my child’s classroom only had 5 pictures of girls doing science, she’ll be scarred for life”). If the media stopped with the identity politics, let kids be challenged, let you know that kids are
    bloody well capable, we’d be so much better off as a society.

    Kids would be able to rationalise the situation from the article in a heartbeat if we just stopped the feelings over facts and assuming they’re fragile snowflakes. We are fucking things up for the next generation. Stop it!

    If you are a parent or a teacher, make sure you’re not complicit or an enabler. Children are far smarter than they’re given credit for.

  • Gaita Ponto

    The normalization of pedophilia continues.

    • Pat Patrix

      How did you get that out of this?

      • Sannidor

        According to some, kids can consent to gender transition therefore they can make other adult decisions too because, well, why the fuck not. Obviously children can’t understand the consequences of chemical and surgical mutilation, they’re irresponsible and natural attention seekers but liberals are so immature, they themselves identify as grown-up kids, perceive adulthood standards as oppressive and use mental gymnastics to justify pedophilia for decades.

  • Randy Lay

    when I was a child my best friend was a girl that identified as a boy ..she played with boys ..played boy games ..did boy things ..talked like a boy ..dressed like a boy ..hated girl things .. but she was ok with girl pronouns and was ok with the term tomboy .. in our early teens we had the conversation and I asked the question …did she wish she was a boy? her answer is im happy being a girl who is just one of the guys .. and that was the end of that ..then in a few more years puberty happened and she found out that there were girl things she liked ..and I found out that there were girl things that she was good at ..really good at ..and we went from being best friends to boyfriend /girlfriend ..she still dressed boyish in school and when just hanging out but on date night she went all girl ..and ohhlala what a girl

  • MichaelCrackMonkey

    Soon you will see people harassed for being against Pedophilia. They will be called Pedophobic because they don’t believe adults should have sex with children.

    • James

      The Left will never endorse pedophilia

      because if they do, they’ll lose the ability to kick down anyone’s doors any time for any reason under the cover of “CP”

  • Heywood Jablowme

    They ought to rape those commie teachers.

  • Hairatic Rick

    As a kid when I made a face my mother would say: “look out, if a cold wind comes in it will freeze you face like that forever”.
    I wish a cold wind would freeze these people in place forever so that their parents would have to clean up the mess, they let happen, by having to care for them forever!

  • Hairatic Rick

    Shared psychosis, is a real psychiatric syndrome in which symptoms of a delusional belief are transmitted from one individual to another. The non delusional person buys into and incorporates the delusions of the mad person. ???????????????????? HA!

  • James

    So, they’ve changed their school district TWICE because their son can’t cope with being in the presence of crossdressers, and now they’re pursuing LEGAL ACTION because, and I quote, “the suggestion that
    gender is fluid conflicts with their Christian beliefs”.

    Has the left finally begun false-flagging in earnest? Or is the right just doomed to lose the meme war?